Skip to main content

Cigarette Ban

It’s time for a statewide ban on cigarette smoking in bars and restaurants. Our American society doesn’t let restaurants sell food that causes cancer, and they shouldn’t serve air that causes cancer either. If a private business had unlimited rights, we could have strip clubs next to schools and factories in residential neighborhoods. Thank goodness most people support some rules that help make our community safe and livable.

I want to support people’s right to do as they please, but there are limits. You can chew gum all you want, but when I find it on my clothes and in my hair, we have a problem. Cigarette smoke ends up on everyone in the room, in their hair and on their clothes, and imaginary lines dividing a room into sections don’t stop it.

If our clothes are disgusting after leaving a smoke-filled establishment, imagine our lungs. Clothes are passive receptacles of air quality, while lungs pump air in and out continually. It bothers me that our children are exposed to that. It bothers me that some smokers consider their habit more important than the health of someone with asthma.

Millions of dollars are raised annually to fund cancer cure research, but no cure is guaranteed. We can prevent cancer cases, guaranteed, with a ban on bar and restaurant smoking. Let’s not wait any longer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi...
2 comments
Read more

New Yorker letter to editor

(In The New Yorker, 2/4/08, p5) Jeanne Guillemin, a senior fellor in MIT's Security Studies Program, wrote an excellent letter to the editor regarding how Americans talk about casualties. I'm unable to find a link to a full-text example, but here is an excerpt: "In wars since 1945, American combat mortality figures have sharply declined, while the exclusivity of the American claim on memorialization has intensified, as if U.S. soldiers were the only casualties in Korea or Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq, and the deaths of many thousands of civilians killed in those distant conflicts merited no acknowledgment and carried no meaning. Whose deaths matter and whose do not always tells a great deal about American politics and culture."
1 comment
Read more

Voter Fraud

There's been a lot of talk in Wisconsin about voter fraud and what needs to be done to prevent voter fraud. I'd like to address what the real voter fraud is and what it is not. There has been no substantial voter fraud proven in this state in recent memory. No statistically significant voter fraud has even been alleged. The accusations that are tossed around have more to do with someone standing too close to a polling station when they hand out literature than with someone actually voting in an illigitimate way. One couple in a recent election voted by absentee, then again at the polling station. They were caught easily. The system worked. The fraud that is used to justify so-called voter reform is not a problem. It's not just fear of getting caught that deters voter fraud today. In modern America, voter fraud is by-and-large a very inefficient way to influence an election. You have to find a group of people who are willing to commit crimes, you have to subvert the system a...
1 comment
Read more