Skip to main content

Comments on anti-illegal immigration nonsense

I'm not really that invested in the illegal immigration issue, but I'm not a big fan of wild distortions. Here's a quick breakdown of some of the nonsense in the email (the email itself is copied in the previous blog post, if you'd like to see it).

The Iraq and Afganastan wars should not be lumped together for any cost comparison. Iraq was the optional one that was based on "poor intelligence" of more than one type.

It is also untrue to suggest that if illegal immigrants cost us too much, the war must not have cost too much. Perhaps both cost too much!

Next, if you support our troops in any way, you can’t talk about the cost of the war and leave out the loss of American lives. This email leaves that out. What is the implication? Since it doesn’t hit our pocketbook, maybe it’s not worth mentioning? I disagree.

Estimates for the cost of the Iraq War range from $700B-1T (so far). Please note, it also does not include the long-term cost of health care for those soldiers who have been injured. The estimates for that cost are staggering, and will go on for a generation.

Some other notes: “Fairus.org” is an anti-immigration website. (Many of these websites are far from credible.) It was not difficult to find another source which stated that “As the Congressional Research Service points out in a 2007 report, undocumented immigrants, who comprise nearly one-third of all immigrants in the country, are not eligible to receive public "welfare" benefits -- ever.” This is a blog sponsored by the Houston Chronicle, which is a real newspaper. http://blogs.chron.com/immigration/archives/2008/01/post_80.html

The second “Verify at” is very interesting because it also claims to estimate the “total” annual cost of illegal immigration to the government, which it pins at less than $11B, far short of the $338B that the email claims. Another part of the linked article that the email fails to mention is this: “In terms of welfare use, receipt of cash assistance programs tends to be very low.” http://cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

Funny what happens when you actually look into these claims.

Did anybody notice the double and triple counting? 11-22B on welfare by states, then 2.2B on food assistance, then $90B for welfare…? These are counting the same dollars. The $90B figure is bunk, by the way.

$200B annually in suppressed wages? Well then don’t listen to Karl Rove, who said this about illegal immigrants: “We can't just root them out and not have some economic damage done to our country. Let's be honest about it. It's going to cost big economic damage to our country. Not only will prices of a lot of things go up, but we're going to see a lot of jobs leave the country and never come home again.”

Part of the absurd cost counting in this email is the allegedly high cost of deportation. So I guess the email is in support of amnesty for illegal aliens, because deportation is too costly? If not, then what's the point of this figure? This email suggests it would cost $11,500 per illegal immigrant to deport them, assuming the maximum estimate of 20M illegal immigrants in America. Interesting calculation.

Anyone check out rense.com, another so-called “source” for this email? Yikes.

The sex crimes stuff is really stupid and has no basis in reality. Check out http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2007/01/sex_crimes_and_illegal_immigra_1.php.

I’ll close with this: it is necessary for a nation to have an immigration policy, it is necessary to limit immigration, and it is necessary to enforce the laws of a nation. It is not necessary to hate poor, desperate people (illegal immigrant or not), or to blame them for the difficult things in life.

Some of us are familiar with the story of the good Samaritan. Dr. Martin Luther King wondered what people were thinking when they walked by the poor hurt man in the ditch and did not help him. They were probably nervous or scared, and wondered “If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?” But, Dr. King proposed, the good Samaritan came along and “he reversed the question: 'If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?’”

I suggest that most of us have been raised to be like the good Samaritan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 2020 Vote: Bending toward justice

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.  --  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. My hero, Dr. King, was wrong about justice. I love Dr. King. His writings and speeches are collected in a book called “A Testament of Hope”. That book was a revelation for me. Dr. King had a moral clarity that is rare in this world. Many of his observations were accurate, wise, and timeless. But the ‘arc of the moral universe’ statement is misleading. We are promised no such experience in this world. In Dr. King’s time, the quote may have been both accurate and wise. King saw the expanding reach of national newspapers and television networks. When the nation, through that new media, was exposed to the reality and brutality of overt Southern racism--then the nation, which believed it shared a common and decent morality, imposed that morality on the South. While Dr. King’s understanding may have been both accurate and wise, it was not timeless. This is where my moral hero comes u...

Federal incompetence is an equilibrium strategy

I’ve heard a number of commentators--right, left, and center--characterize Trump as the pivotal problem with Republican leadership. But why was Trump overwhelming to the Republican party? Why was he gradually embraced by nearly all Republican leadership? And would the Republican party be much different today without him? Each party is made up of different interest groups. Two large factions of the Republican Party are fiscal conservatives and the Christian Right. The fiscal conservatives are dominated by Free Market Fundamentalists. Anti-tax pledges and opposition to virtually any government regulations are Free Market Fundamentalist positions, and those positions are prominent in the current Republican party. The Christian Right wants white Christian conservative values to dominate American culture. They once did dominate American culture, and they want to turn back the clock. These two influential factions of the Republican party do not make natural teammates. Free Market Fundamental...

Recommended podcasts (update)

Two years ago I listed my recommended podcasts. Here’s an updated list. Guide: Asterisks are meant to show how timeless the episodes are. One asterisk (*) means the last year or so is likely still relevant.  Three (***) means you could (or should) start from the first  episode and it would still be relevant. The number two (2) means they were also on my list two years ago. I don't necessarily listen to every episode, especially for podcasts that do different topics or different guests (like Vox, Spycast, Hidden Brain). You can’t really skip episodes for serials (podcasts that tell a story, like In the Dark). Tiers are based on a combination of quality and personal preference. Tier 1 In the Dark *** [Crime podcast. Start with season 1. This show is amazing.] Revisionist History *** (2) [Malcolm Gladwell's podcast. First couple seasons were outstanding. The most recent episodes are just ads for Gladwell's other projects.] I Spy by Foreign Policy *** [Fun stuff....