Skip to main content

Excellent campaigning

I'm not a fan of the so-called reforms about Wisconsin's collective bargaining for public workers. To be fair, reform was necessary, but it went a little too far in some ways and way too far in other ways. Regardless, I have to give props to the campaign the "WI Club for Growth" has going on. It's the billboard below. Because of the psychology involved, it's an excellent campaign.



The reason it's particularly excellent is because research shows that so many people automatically discount ads from party they disagree with. If you are a Democrat who likes Democrat A, any ad that says "Democrat A is good" turns you on and any ad that says "Democrat A is bad" turns you off. Both happen viscerally even before you apply rational thought to it.


So this ad starts by inviting you in before your brain can shut out the ad viscerally, before you can recognize it is not pro-Democrat A. It shows a nice picture of Barrett's face (from his own mayoral site, I believe). It says something that is apparently complimentary. Then it slides in the dagger. Because of the positive Barrett image and the positive main statement, it will cause some cognitive dissonance for Democrats, like it or not.

Ads like this don't have to change someone's mind in order to change the debate. If they influence Democrats to speak up just a little less loudly or less often, and embolden Republicans to speak out a little louder or more often, that is how they influence things. Suddenly the Republican position seems more popular, and people are influenced by that 'social proof'. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_proof


Of course, the figure (on the billboard) is arguable and, like much of the "savings" that today's Republicans brag about, there's an assumption that it was saved without any cost, as if someone just donated that money rather than cutting benefits or services.


Perhaps this technique can be used by others:



George W. Bush's legacy keeps looking better
because Obama stopped things from getting even worse.



It's time to end class warfare
or we will destroy you. Paid for by the top 1%.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi...
2 comments
Read more

New Yorker letter to editor

(In The New Yorker, 2/4/08, p5) Jeanne Guillemin, a senior fellor in MIT's Security Studies Program, wrote an excellent letter to the editor regarding how Americans talk about casualties. I'm unable to find a link to a full-text example, but here is an excerpt: "In wars since 1945, American combat mortality figures have sharply declined, while the exclusivity of the American claim on memorialization has intensified, as if U.S. soldiers were the only casualties in Korea or Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq, and the deaths of many thousands of civilians killed in those distant conflicts merited no acknowledgment and carried no meaning. Whose deaths matter and whose do not always tells a great deal about American politics and culture."
1 comment
Read more

Voter Fraud

There's been a lot of talk in Wisconsin about voter fraud and what needs to be done to prevent voter fraud. I'd like to address what the real voter fraud is and what it is not. There has been no substantial voter fraud proven in this state in recent memory. No statistically significant voter fraud has even been alleged. The accusations that are tossed around have more to do with someone standing too close to a polling station when they hand out literature than with someone actually voting in an illigitimate way. One couple in a recent election voted by absentee, then again at the polling station. They were caught easily. The system worked. The fraud that is used to justify so-called voter reform is not a problem. It's not just fear of getting caught that deters voter fraud today. In modern America, voter fraud is by-and-large a very inefficient way to influence an election. You have to find a group of people who are willing to commit crimes, you have to subvert the system a...
1 comment
Read more