Skip to main content

The Magical Fruit

Beans, beans, the magical fruit;
The more you eat, the more you toot.
The more you toot, the better you feel,
So eat some beans for every meal!

I remember this lyric from my childhood. I remember chanting it with other kids, and how we cracked up about anything related to farts. My kids are in the same age range now. I’m not sure they know the rhyme. But they know how hilarious farts are.

Most of what I knew about beans came from that lyric. It’s like an anti-bean advertisement memorized my millions of kids. It’s been a nightmare for the bean industry. These little bits of culture frame our perceptions, and framing matters.

Years ago I read Mindless Eating, by Brian Wansink. He describes a number of fascinating studies showing the impact of perception on eating. One of my favorite had to do with wine. Wansink and his team presented people with red wine at a wine and cheese party. Half of the people got the ‘real’ thing, a California wine. The other half received the exact same wine, but re-labelled as a “North Dakota” vineyard. Although it was exactly the same wine, of course people rated the California wine significantly better. Not only that--they rated the cheese that came with the California wine higher as well.

Framing is magnified when it’s intertwined with culture. The meat industry doesn’t have to work too hard to keep meat first in line when people think of protein, because both are related to strength and masculinity in our culture.

A guy I work with talks about his food choices as if they were an extension of his “I live life” persona. He smokes, he rides a Harley, he won’t settle down, and by God he will savor every new burger or taco that McDonald’s or Taco Bell cranks out. He’s the Marlboro Man of McDonald’s, living free and tough and strong. McDonald’s could put him in a commercial.

McDonald’s alone spends nearly a billion dollars on advertising annually. They know food can taste better or worse depending on a person’s mindset. Marketing works, and perception matters.

In 1977, a Senate committee report recommended that Americans decrease consumption of meat, eggs, and other foods high in fat. Meat and dairy producers feared that this new framing would devastate their business. They pushed back hard, arguing that the report should not include language about eating “less” of anything. The final report recommended that people eat… more… as in, eat more meats low in saturated fat.

That was 40 years ago. The agency responsible for our food guidelines (the USDA) is still the same agency responsible for supporting the agriculture industry. No conflicting priorities there, right?

I was looking for some little ways to improve my own diet, and uploaded several different nutrition podcasts to sample. Only one passed the “based on real science and not trying to sell stuff” test: Nutrition Facts with Dr. Greger. I listened and liked what I heard. He mentioned that he had a book out, and that all the proceeds go to charity (which includes his own not-for-profit, NutritionFacts.org).

The book’s unfortunate title is How Not to Die. Despite the morbid title, it is an important book in my life. I’ve read other good books about food: The Omnivore’s Dilemma, In Defense of Food, and Mindless Eating. The book that impacted my life is How Not to Die.

There are now decades of research about food and health. The results of this research are consistent, decisive, and unambiguous. The book lays it all out.

Across all categories of health, plant foods support health, and animal foods increase disease. It’s not just about obesity. Virtually every category of disease increases along with an increase in animal product intake.

Am I saying that fatty beef is bad, and chicken and fish are good? No. They are all bad in different ways and to different degrees. Am I saying that animal products are only healthy when eaten in moderation? No. Even moderate amounts of animal products in our diet promote disease.

That’s tough to hear. Tough to believe. What about three squares a day? What about a meat-and-potatoes man? What about the food pyramid? What about meat for protein and milk for calcium? What about milk does a body good? Food culture is strong.

I’ve been so impressed at the reactions when I talk about this book. You’d think I was telling people I’m quitting my job to go live in a commune. I just refer vaguely to the research, and how I’ve personally reacted to that knowledge (I basically eat a lot less meat and other animal products). It doesn’t seem at all extreme to me, but people react as if it is extreme.

It happened so naturally for me. It’s like… let’s say Joe’s Restaurant is your favorite place for lunch. If in the morning, you see a news report that Joe’s food causes health problems, you will likely opt to have lunch somewhere else. You don’t need a big plan to eat somewhere else; the decision just naturally follows the new information. That’s what has happened to me. How Not to Die has changed what I choose to eat. There was no big decision or health scare or diet strategy. Different choices naturally followed the new information.

I also want to defend Dr. Greger’s approach. He agrees that food choices are relative. Eggs are better for you than sausage. A baked chicken sandwich is healthier than a fried chicken sandwich. But he doesn’t think it’s his role to hide the results of the research to appease our cultural sensitivities.

Human progress can be a real paradox, and I have an analogy for that: “Humans put men on the moon before we put wheels on a standard set of luggage”. We can achieve amazing technical results, like putting men on the moon. But we achieved the amazing technical achievement of walking on the moon before wheels became a standard feature of luggage.

We have decoded the genome and have the ability, in some areas, to match individuals to the best possible medication by knowing their genetic code. It’s an amazing technical achievement. But many more lives would be improved if people just ate less animal product and more plant food.

Dr. Greger has an app called “Dr. Greger’s Daily Dozen”. He presents a twelve item to-eat checklist. It’s the same every day. The first item on the list: beans. The magical fruit.

The list continues with fruits, vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, greens, and so on. I didn’t so much try to cut back on meat as I tried to hit the daily dozen. Now that I know the research related to these foods, and the research related to the animal and processed foods you don’t find on the list, it’s clear that beans really are magical. The foods on the list, and many other whole natural plant foods, are all magical. Their health effects are impressive.

Read the book. If you don’t like thick books, check out the NutritionFacts.org website for videos. Download the Daily Dozen app and give it a try. If you don’t want to change lots of your diet, try changing just a little.

Speaking for myself--it’s been easy to embrace the changes, because of how much better I feel.

Peace and God bless,

Matt

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker letter to editor

(In The New Yorker, 2/4/08, p5) Jeanne Guillemin, a senior fellor in MIT's Security Studies Program, wrote an excellent letter to the editor regarding how Americans talk about casualties. I'm unable to find a link to a full-text example, but here is an excerpt: "In wars since 1945, American combat mortality figures have sharply declined, while the exclusivity of the American claim on memorialization has intensified, as if U.S. soldiers were the only casualties in Korea or Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq, and the deaths of many thousands of civilians killed in those distant conflicts merited no acknowledgment and carried no meaning. Whose deaths matter and whose do not always tells a great deal about American politics and culture."

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi

Welfare for the wealthy

I was struck by today's Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Not literally, but in the Crossroads section, on opposite sides of the spread, were two articles that reflect our nation's "welfare for the rich." On 2J, a local economics instructor's article "Tax for Miller Park didn't help economy." He criticized a previous article which had suggested the opposite. The previous article was based almost entirely on reports by Major League Baseball, which clearly has a huge bias. This week's article takes an objective look, and summarizes that taxpayer's don't get much in return, but the fat cat players and executives of MLB walk away with huge paychecks. The drive to fund new ballparks almost never starts with taxpayers--it starts with the deep pockets of baseball executives, PR campaigns and connections with political power. On 3J, George Will was taking on the Fed ("What the Fed should never do"), rightly criticizing it for bailing out Bear