Skip to main content

The Optimist’s Toolbox: Mindset

I read a lot when I was young. I started writing. I dreamed I might write like Hemingway someday. I got good feedback from teachers at school. Writing seemed easier for me than it was for other kids.

When I went to college, I started as a Journalism major. I got a job at the college newspaper and was assigned some stories. I had no idea what I was doing. I didn’t know how to prepare, how to interview, how to investigate, or how to structure information. I had never written with such tight constraints and quick deadlines.

I worked hard to finish stories, only to have them come right back for major revisions. The dream I had, that I was a great writer, suddenly felt foolish. A year later, I had largely given up on writing. My new college majors were Psychology and Advertising. I left writing behind.

I had a ‘fixed’ mindset about writing skills. “I’m a really good writer.” I possessed a special skill; all I had to do was apply my talent and I would shine. When the challenge level increased and I got feedback that threatened my dream, I didn’t see alternatives. I just thought my dream was a farce, and I might as well move on.

This is what Psychologist Carol Dweck has called ‘mindset’ theory. Our mindset about a skill is on a continuum from a ‘fixed’ mindset to a ‘growth’ mindset. Mindset is a nice addition to the optimist’s toolbox.

A ‘fixed’ mindset means someone thinks their skill is a possession. It’s like believing that you have a certain amount of innate talent, and that’s just the way it is. Whether you think you have a little talent or a lot, this can lead to problems.

My fixed mindset about writing skill is part of the reason I gave up on journalism. One day I possessed talent, and the next day I thought I saw evidence that the talent was gone. I started looking for somewhere else to shine.

Another trap of the fixed mindset is when people intentionally stop trying so they can protect their ego. A student might not study for a test. Their ego is then protected, because a bad grade in the class doesn't mean they lack talent--it was because they didn’t try.

A ‘growth’ mindset is when people believe their skill is built through effort and time. The skill they have today is because of the effort they put in yesterday. They believe they can be bad at something today, but good at it in the future.

If I’d had a growth mindset in college, perhaps I would have given journalism another year. Perhaps instead of thinking “I’m actually not that good at this,” I would have thought, “I mastered high school writing assignments, and eventually I can master this, too.” Perhaps I’d have seen feedback as an opportunity to learn and not a threat to my ego.

It’s a common trap, and it’s easy to fall into. When I was in high school, some kids were just considered ‘smart’. Later, when I worked with college students at universities, I saw what happened when those ‘smart kids’ were no longer the smartest kids in the room.

It was just like when I discovered I wasn’t the best writer in the room. When things get challenging, mindset matters.

I’ve been so aware of mindset with my kids. I can see that Dweck’s mindset theory has had some influence in the schools, but people tend to interpret it as simple ‘you can do it’ cheerleading. It’s not cheerleading. There are different thought patterns that lead to different outcomes.

When my kids do well, I tell them: You do well because you love learning. You do well because you like to figure things out. It wasn’t easy to learn all that but I’m glad you got it. Good job working hard.

That's about mindset. It’s a great tool in the optimist’s toolbox.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deferred Maintenance

I once worked at a public university that had a huge 'deferred maintenance' problem. Their major equipment was often 35 years old with an expected lifetime of 30 years. As a result, they were constantly doing repairs and paying overtime, but had little time to do preventive maintenance and little money to make pro-active investments in new equipment. In one dorm, water from bad showers on the upper floors started leaking into the main lobby, and the 'fix' was to drag out garbage cans to catch the water. I was told that repairing the plumbing itself was expensive so it was being figured into the "five-year budget plan." The garbage can fix went on for at least a year. A two-page spread in The Atlantic Monthly (March 2008, p 38-39) calls out our nation's growing infrastructure problem. This is a real 'tragedy of the commons' situation: individuals are not willing to give up more tax money if they don't see a real-time, personal benefit. At the sa...

Whose fault are high gas prices?

GM recently announced the closing of several auto plants in North America, primarily those that make large, gas inefficient vehicles. The news anchor began the segment with "Due to high gas prices..." Since everyone's blaming high gas prices for our woes these days, it begs the question "Whose fault are high gas prices?" Your driveway is the first place to look for answers. If your car gets bad mileage, that's probably your fault. Some luck, huh? After that, I blame "the invisible hand." This is the idea that when everyone follows their own self-interest in a free market, everyone ends up better off. Everyone is motivated to work hard and be efficient and produce goods that others want to trade for. Free markets do a fine job of producing wealth and prosperity, but they've really botched the energy situation. For all it's glory, the invisible hand has little strategic foresight. In the 1970s, we learned that America was vulnerable to high e...

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi...