Skip to main content

A peak at Joe Biden's character from 25 years ago

Twenty-five years ago, I got a glimpse of Joe Biden's character. I think it’s beautiful and want to share it.

When I was younger and wanted to kick back and relax, I would, of course, watch C-SPAN. What can I say? I was pretty cool.

There was still some political grandstanding 25 years ago, but in those days Congresspeople sometimes actually tried to convince each other of things. It wasn’t just canned talking points.

One day I saw Senator Joe Biden give a talk on the Senate floor. This was almost exactly 25 years ago. After I watched his talk, I had two thoughts:

  1. Why can’t a guy like this be President?
  2. He’s wearing his heart on his sleeve in this talk, and that kind of thing does not get you to the Presidency.

So.. what was he talking about?

This was after the fall of the Berlin wall and the disintegration of the USSR. The former country of Yugoslavia had essentially broken apart into smaller districts, and violence broke out along ethnic and religious lines. Biden had been to the area on a couple Congressional fact-finding missions, and he had submitted a report about the situation.

The US initially put an arms embargo on the entire area, but to some degree the result was that the Serbians had arms and the Bosnians did not. The Serbs carried out a policy they referred to as “ethnic cleansing”. The Serbian military targeted and killed Bosnian Muslims.

There are a couple moments in his talk that stuck in my memory, even these many years later. Biden had an intuition that if the Bosnians were Christian instead of Muslim, America would not have tolerated the killing. That angered him.

Biden says he knows that his speech is probably going to be used against him later on--but he still speaks with passion. “What I’m about to say is going to cause me great difficulty if I’m re-elected and come back here as the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, but Europe cannot stay united without the United States. There is no moral center in Europe. When in the last two centuries have [they] moved to... stand up to this kind of genocide? ...the only reason anything is happening now is because the United States of America is finally, finally understanding her role.”

Later, Biden paints a vivid picture of what life in Sarajevo was like for the people living there at the time. He takes you there with his description. “I visited, with Bob Dole, a hospital in Sarajevo. Do you know who was in that hospital? Seven children. You know why it was only seven children? Because the Serbs sit in those hills, and they have as a campaign of terror: the maiming of children. Walk with me through Sarajevo’s streets and see, draped across the roads, blankets and sheets. I thought it was the lower East Side in 1919 in New York. And I asked ‘Why?’. You know why [the blankets and sheets are] there? To take off the line of fire from Serbian snipers shooting children. ...we stood beside a beautiful raven-haired child who looked past us as we spoke, and the neurosurgeon said, ‘The reason she’s not turning is she has no sight’. [The neurosurgeon] turned her head, the bullet had gone in the back of her head, severed the optic nerve and came out the other side. There were seven children in that hospital. Nobody else!

Here’s a link to that speech.

Dec 13th, 1995, on C-SPAN2

Joe Biden on the Bosnia Mission Resolution Debate



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker letter to editor

(In The New Yorker, 2/4/08, p5) Jeanne Guillemin, a senior fellor in MIT's Security Studies Program, wrote an excellent letter to the editor regarding how Americans talk about casualties. I'm unable to find a link to a full-text example, but here is an excerpt: "In wars since 1945, American combat mortality figures have sharply declined, while the exclusivity of the American claim on memorialization has intensified, as if U.S. soldiers were the only casualties in Korea or Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq, and the deaths of many thousands of civilians killed in those distant conflicts merited no acknowledgment and carried no meaning. Whose deaths matter and whose do not always tells a great deal about American politics and culture."

Welfare for the wealthy

I was struck by today's Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Not literally, but in the Crossroads section, on opposite sides of the spread, were two articles that reflect our nation's "welfare for the rich." On 2J, a local economics instructor's article "Tax for Miller Park didn't help economy." He criticized a previous article which had suggested the opposite. The previous article was based almost entirely on reports by Major League Baseball, which clearly has a huge bias. This week's article takes an objective look, and summarizes that taxpayer's don't get much in return, but the fat cat players and executives of MLB walk away with huge paychecks. The drive to fund new ballparks almost never starts with taxpayers--it starts with the deep pockets of baseball executives, PR campaigns and connections with political power. On 3J, George Will was taking on the Fed ("What the Fed should never do"), rightly criticizing it for bailing out Bear

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi