Skip to main content

Iran war: pragmatic comments

 

  • The first problem with Trump’s attack on Iran is that it expands precedent for the President to exercise relatively unlimited foreign policy power. The current Congress should push back for Constitutional reasons but will not for political reasons; the Supreme Court has also shown tremendous deference to MAGA. The first politics is local politics, and the local politics is that it’s bad for America when Presidents initiate armed conflict without Congressional support and based on personal judgment.

  • Trump’s administration was testing a number of justifications with the public through several outlets in the lead-up to this attack. Examples: Iran still wants nuclear weapons (I thought we set them way back), Iran has missiles that can reach Europe (Iran isn’t nearly the threat to Europe that Russia is), Iran is repressive (among many other nations), and others. Ultimately, Trump senses that Iran is relatively weak and he is looking for a win. His administration has no intention of telling us their real reasons–they’re just testing different messages to push through a few news cycles.

  • The stated goal of this attack is regime change. I wish I had any confidence that we would see the current bad guys replaced with the good guys. The Trump administration has made it clear that they don’t oppose bad guys if those bad guys are ready to “make deals” where Trump and his friends will benefit. There’s a strong chance that the prior regime in Iran is replaced with a new set of autocrats ready to “make deals” with this administration.

  • People will remain uncertain about the moral standing of this attack because the Iranian regime is not a sympathetic character. If Iran’s military and leadership had spontaneously combusted, Americans (myself included) would not have seen it as a tragedy. Watching a movie, we may smile when a bully is hit in the head with a rock; in real life we need to decide whether we want children throwing rocks on a whim.

  • We have seen protests in Iran and the population has been shifting away from the fundamentalist regime. Good for them. Perhaps in one, five, or ten years, regime change was inevitable, from the grassroots. Now this administration will deny that any such future would have been possible without their intervention.

  • My favorite part of our attack on Iran is that Iran has been a major weapons supplier to Russia during Russia’s terrorist campaign in Ukraine. Iran’s shipments are likely over. However, Russia was already in the process of shifting that production to Russia, and continues to receive arms from China and North Korea, so I’m not holding my breath that Russia will face meaningful shortages.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2020 Vote: Bending toward justice

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.  --  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. My hero, Dr. King, was wrong about justice. I love Dr. King. His writings and speeches are collected in a book called “A Testament of Hope”. That book was a revelation for me. Dr. King had a moral clarity that is rare in this world. Many of his observations were accurate, wise, and timeless. But the ‘arc of the moral universe’ statement is misleading. We are promised no such experience in this world. In Dr. King’s time, the quote may have been both accurate and wise. King saw the expanding reach of national newspapers and television networks. When the nation, through that new media, was exposed to the reality and brutality of overt Southern racism--then the nation, which believed it shared a common and decent morality, imposed that morality on the South. While Dr. King’s understanding may have been both accurate and wise, it was not timeless. This is where my moral hero comes u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recommended podcasts (update)

Two years ago I listed my recommended podcasts. Here’s an updated list. Guide: Asterisks are meant to show how timeless the episodes are. One asterisk (*) means the last year or so is likely still relevant.  Three (***) means you could (or should) start from the first  episode and it would still be relevant. The number two (2) means they were also on my list two years ago. I don't necessarily listen to every episode, especially for podcasts that do different topics or different guests (like Vox, Spycast, Hidden Brain). You can’t really skip episodes for serials (podcasts that tell a story, like In the Dark). Tiers are based on a combination of quality and personal preference. Tier 1 In the Dark *** [Crime podcast. Start with season 1. This show is amazing.] Revisionist History *** (2) [Malcolm Gladwell's podcast. First couple seasons were outstanding. The most recent episodes are just ads for Gladwell's other projects.] I Spy by Foreign Policy *** [Fun stuff....
Post a Comment
Read more

Federal incompetence is an equilibrium strategy

I’ve heard a number of commentators--right, left, and center--characterize Trump as the pivotal problem with Republican leadership. But why was Trump overwhelming to the Republican party? Why was he gradually embraced by nearly all Republican leadership? And would the Republican party be much different today without him? Each party is made up of different interest groups. Two large factions of the Republican Party are fiscal conservatives and the Christian Right. The fiscal conservatives are dominated by Free Market Fundamentalists. Anti-tax pledges and opposition to virtually any government regulations are Free Market Fundamentalist positions, and those positions are prominent in the current Republican party. The Christian Right wants white Christian conservative values to dominate American culture. They once did dominate American culture, and they want to turn back the clock. These two influential factions of the Republican party do not make natural teammates. Free Market Fundamental...
Post a Comment
Read more