Skip to main content

Bad Memes: This meme makes me sad.




This meme makes me sad. It takes a cheap shot at both climate scientists and meteorologists. I call it out here because of the mockery. It bypasses rational thought. It discounts science without having to engage in any reasoning. The laugh-till-you-cry faces emphasize the attitude you should have toward 'those people'.


It’s important to note the impact these memes have on social interactions. They discourage actual discussion on these topics. Someone posts a meme that mocks a person, position, or party, and any friend who disagrees knows what topics to avoid.


I'm offended by a cheap shot at meteorologists.


Meteorologists have an immensely difficult job, and the predictions they make about events like hurricanes are amazing by any measure. Fifty years ago, people found out about hurricanes when the hurricane showed up. Now we have days to prepare, to board up windows, and to evacuate entire areas. Meteorologists save lives.


Have you ever tracked a hurricane projection in the news over the course of a week? I have, and I find the predictions impressive.


I have an analogy for weather prediction: If someone fills your hands with sand and makes you walk around your house, it’s easy to predict that much of the sand will fall from your hands (There is, let's say, a 90% chance of sandfall). It’s really difficult, however, to predict how much will fall on any one square inch of your floor. That’s what people seem to expect meteorologists to do, and it’s just not reasonable.


Likewise, climatologists have done quite well at predicting climate change and its impacts. They have not said that in ten years we will die from global warming. Someone might be confusing climate science with the movies.


Climate scientists have said that glaciers will melt, sea levels will rise, extremes will be more common, and coral reefs will die off. How accurate do you think that's been? They've said that eventually, global food supplies will be threatened. Hopefully their accuracy stops there.


I don’t mind if you chuckle at the occasional meme. I certainly do. But I hope your chuckle is followed up with a little objective review. Is this respectful? Is this polite? Is it a fair representation of what other reasonable people think?


Memes can be funny. Memes can be cute. But they can also be mean-spirited and misleading. Be careful.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Yorker letter to editor

(In The New Yorker, 2/4/08, p5) Jeanne Guillemin, a senior fellor in MIT's Security Studies Program, wrote an excellent letter to the editor regarding how Americans talk about casualties. I'm unable to find a link to a full-text example, but here is an excerpt: "In wars since 1945, American combat mortality figures have sharply declined, while the exclusivity of the American claim on memorialization has intensified, as if U.S. soldiers were the only casualties in Korea or Vietnam or, more recently, Iraq, and the deaths of many thousands of civilians killed in those distant conflicts merited no acknowledgment and carried no meaning. Whose deaths matter and whose do not always tells a great deal about American politics and culture."
1 comment
Read more

Welfare for the wealthy

I was struck by today's Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Not literally, but in the Crossroads section, on opposite sides of the spread, were two articles that reflect our nation's "welfare for the rich." On 2J, a local economics instructor's article "Tax for Miller Park didn't help economy." He criticized a previous article which had suggested the opposite. The previous article was based almost entirely on reports by Major League Baseball, which clearly has a huge bias. This week's article takes an objective look, and summarizes that taxpayer's don't get much in return, but the fat cat players and executives of MLB walk away with huge paychecks. The drive to fund new ballparks almost never starts with taxpayers--it starts with the deep pockets of baseball executives, PR campaigns and connections with political power. On 3J, George Will was taking on the Fed ("What the Fed should never do"), rightly criticizing it for bailing out Bear
Post a Comment
Read more

Real Estate in America

We sold our house this summer and bought a new home. The experience has led me to reflect on homes and home-buying in America. As in any industry, there are good and bad incentives at work in real estate. A home seller would like to get the highest price for their house and sell it in a reasonable period of time. The industry operates on a commission system so that the agent seeks to sell the house at a higher price. This incentive works, but only to a point. Consider the impact of $5000 on the seller vs. the agent. Six percent of $5000 is $300. After the realty company and purchasing agent take their cut, the agent isn't left with much. A $5000 difference in the price of the house means little to the agent, but a lot to the home owner. Does an agent become successful by getting the highest price or by turning over lots of houses? The answer is obvious. An agent's ideal world is not one where people get exactly the right price for their homes, it is a world where everyone is wi
2 comments
Read more